Thought Box

November 6, 2009

October 2009 Blog Report

Filed under: Blog reports — Tags: , , , , , , , — deathgleaner @ 3:25 pm
Statistic Value Change from previous month
Number of views 311 -67.0%, -631
Number of days
31 +3.3%, +1
Average views/day 10.0 -213.0%, -21.37
# of Tags (total)
340 +13.3%, +40
# of Categories (total)
17 0%, 0
# of Comments (total)
114 +6.5%, +7
# of Posts (total)
69 13.1% , +8
Busiest day
October 8, 20 views -79.2% ,-76
Most viewed post
Another example of phony weight loss…, 43 views -63.2% ,-74
Top referrer blogsurfer.us/index.php?i=6, 11 views* -88.8%, -87
Top search term “apamin weight loss”, 10 views +25%, +2
Top clicks deathgleaner.files.wordpress.com/2009… and deathgleaner.files.wordpress.com/2009…, 3 clicks each -70%, -7
Top-used web browser Internet Explorer (vv. 7.0 , 5.5 [38 views each]), 121 views total N/A
Top-used OS Windows (XP with 98 views), 208 views total N/A
Country with most views United States, 178 views N/A
Top-used OS Windows (XP with 98 views), 208 views total N/A

Statistics are for this month only unless otherwise stated. Asterisk denotes all-time record.

Total blog views since inception: 2403
Notes from the author: Traffic has sunk this month. Only eight blog posts in October. Also note that there are some new statistics, courtesy of GetClicky.com. However, these statistics were compiled November 6th, so they may be very inaccurate.

November 4, 2009

Oops! October 2009 Blog Report coming soon!

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , — deathgleaner @ 6:13 pm

Sorry guys, but if you’ve been waiting for a blog report for October, it hasn’t come. I’ve been sick, and life is getting busy. I will do a blog report (hopefully) this Friday, when things get less busy.

Also if you can remind me every month through my email here, that would be very helpful.

October 30, 2009

Quick look: Twitter Lists

Filed under: Quick Look, Twitter — Tags: , , , — deathgleaner @ 10:10 pm

This is a Beta feature that Twitter has been handing out to select users to try out. I have been trying it out and I must say, it’s quite convenient. I like to think of them as the lists you would have on TweetDeck or Seesmic, but now in Twitter. Plus, people can follow (subscribe) to these lists which is really cool!

The only inconvenient thing is adding people to the list. You have to go through all your list of followers to find people. Luckily you can create lists really easily, and I believe Twitter has made the process almost as simple as can be.

If you get the Twitter lists feature, try it out!

(Note: All blog posts starting with “Quick look” are short posts written in under ten minutes. They are provided for constant updates.)

October 25, 2009

My blog gets… 6/100?!!!

Filed under: Bad, Blog — Tags: , , , , , — deathgleaner @ 8:39 pm

http://blog.grader.com/ says so. Lookey here: http://blog.grader.com/blog/deathgleaner.wordpress.com.

So now do you wonder WHY this is so? Let’s take a look.

Here’s some stats:

  • RANK: 351/1371
  • TRAFFIC RANK (ALEXA): 3,392,772
  • INBOUND LINKS: 256
  • UPDATE FREQUENCY: Weekly

As far as I know, those stats are correct. Let’s look at them in detail.

The Alexa Traffic rank measures the amount of visitors your website gets compared to all the websites in the world. This blog doesn’t get very many viewers, so no wonder it’s so low (in this case, that’s denoted by a high number, that is, rank is in ordinal numbers.)

It also says: “We detected that your feed doesn’t reflect your real website. This affects your blog visibility to search engines and gives false message to your readers.” I don’t know what that means, and I don’t care.

It also gives me a red exclamation mark due to the fact that my blog is on a free blogging website. LAME!

As for comments, Grader counts 70 (probably not including threads, because there’s way more actual comments), and my comments have been referenced on 19 occasions elsewhere on the Internet.

For all this, I get an F-. Not surprising, but what do you think?

October 23, 2009

My take on Apple’s “Magic” mouse

Filed under: Bad, Pictures, Review — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — deathgleaner @ 8:56 pm
Apple's Magic Mouse, side view

Apple's Magic Mouse, side view

When I first looked at that, I thought the thing was a base for one of the new MacBooks. It turns out that it’s a mouse or an iPhone casing. Here’s how Apple puts it:

It began with iPhone. Then came iPod touch. Then MacBook Pro. Intuitive, smart, dynamic. Multi-Touch technology introduced a remarkably better way to interact with your portable devices — all using gestures. Now we’ve reached another milestone by bringing gestures to the desktop with a mouse that’s unlike anything ever before. It’s called Magic Mouse. It’s the world’s first Multi-Touch mouse. And while it comes standard with every new iMac, you can also add it to any Bluetooth-enabled Mac for a Multi-Touch makeover. (source: http://www.apple.com/magicmouse/)

Obviously, the Magic Mouse’s main goal was to transfer touch technology first developed for the iPhone and iPod Touch to a computer mouse.

It is basically a touch-screen mouse, replacing having to click a button with just tapping the mouse.

hero_2_20091020

Honestly, the only thing I like about this mouse is its futuristic seamless design. However, it looks nothing like a mouse but more like something you would see from Star Trek or a sci-fi movie.

The disadvantages to such a mouse is that people who are fidgety tend to tap their fingers on their mouses while working. On a touch mouse like this, that can cause inadvertent clicks.

I can imagine that the mouse would also look extremely confusing. One possible scenario that derives from it’s perfect symmetricality is that a user could be holding the mouse upside down and not even know it.

I see the fact that buttons are absent as a disadvantage. It’s not all that bad, considering that you aren’t confined to a scroll wheel, but the mouse no longer simulates the clicking that users are used to. Many of us use audio clues to tell if we’ve done something or not. With the Magic Mouse these audio clues are gone.

hero_4_20091020

The Magic mouse also has a lesser curved surface than most mouses. This makes your hand flatter and thus slower at moving the mouse. Piano players, we all know that a curved hand contributes to faster movement of fingers than a flattened hand. But then again, if your hand is too curved, that can cause muscle strain. My opinion: too flat, but it just had to be that way.

Last but not least, the price is 69 dollars. That’s a bit on the pricey side, and you’re paying about 30 dollars more just to get touch features. Apple likes to call all this “life-changing,” but haven’t we lived just fine with regular mouses?

Here’s what Apple needs to do: raise up the curvature, put the buttons back, and make it more clear which side is up or down.

I give the Magic Mouse a 6/10, and I do not recommend it. Stick with the Mighty Mouse. It follows the standards more closely.

Oh, and before you go, I must mention this: I’m basing this knowledge from what I’ve seen, not what I’ve tried. I hope to go out this weekend to test the Magic Mouse to see how Magic it is.

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.