Blog Archives
January 2010 Blog Report
| Statistic | Value | Change from previous month |
| Number of views | 483 | +18.9%, +76 |
| Number of days |
31 | 0%, 0 |
| Average views/day | 15.6 | +18.7%, +2.45 |
November 2009 Blog Report
| Statistic | Value | Change from previous month |
| Number of views | 278 | -10.6%, -33 |
| Number of days |
30 | -3.2%, -1 |
| Average views/day | 9.26 | -7.4%, -0.77 |
October 2009 Blog Report
| Statistic | Value | Change from previous month |
| Number of views | 311 | -67.0%, -631 |
| Number of days |
31 | +3.3%, +1 |
| Average views/day | 10.0 | -213.0%, -21.37 |
| # of Tags (total) |
340 | +13.3%, +40 |
| # of Categories (total) |
17 | 0%, 0 |
| # of Comments (total) |
114 | +6.5%, +7 |
| # of Posts (total) |
69 | 13.1% , +8 |
| Busiest day |
October 8, 20 views | -79.2% ,-76 |
| Most viewed post |
Another example of phony weight loss…, 43 views | -63.2% ,-74 |
| Top referrer | blogsurfer.us/index.php?i=6, 11 views* | -88.8%, -87 |
| Top search term | “apamin weight loss”, 10 views | +25%, +2 |
| Top clicks | deathgleaner.files.wordpress.com/2009… and deathgleaner.files.wordpress.com/2009…, 3 clicks each | -70%, -7 |
| Top-used web browser | Internet Explorer (vv. 7.0 , 5.5 [38 views each]), 121 views total | N/A |
| Top-used OS | Windows (XP with 98 views), 208 views total | N/A |
| Country with most views | United States, 178 views | N/A |
| Top-used OS | Windows (XP with 98 views), 208 views total | N/A |
Statistics are for this month only unless otherwise stated. Asterisk denotes all-time record.
Total blog views since inception: 2403
Notes from the author: Traffic has sunk this month. Only eight blog posts in October. Also note that there are some new statistics, courtesy of GetClicky.com. However, these statistics were compiled November 6th, so they may be very inaccurate.
September 2009 Blog Report
| Statistic | Value | Change from previous month |
| Number of views | 942 | +48.3%, +307 |
| Number of days |
30 | -3.3%, -1 |
| Average views/day | 31.4* | +53.245%, +10.91 |
| # of Tags (total) |
300 | +12.4%, +33 |
| # of Categories (total) |
17 | 0%, 0 |
| # of Comments (total) |
107 | +39%, 30 |
| # of Posts (total) |
61 | 15.1% ,8 |
| Busiest day |
September 27, 96 views | -17.9% ,-21 |
| Most viewed post |
MuseScore: A free music…, 117 views (in September) | -61.5% ,-187 |
| Top referrer | mashable.com/2009/09/26/google-11th-b…, 98 views* | +15.2%, +13 |
| Top search term | “apamin smoothie”, 8 views | +33.3%, +2 |
| Top click | google.com/corporate/timeline/#homepa…, 10 clicks | -37.5%, -6 |
Statistics are for this month only unless otherwise stated. Asterisk denotes all-time record.
Total blog views since inception: 2092
Notes from the author: Another month of top posts! Thanks to all the comment readers at Mashable.com, since those were my biggest traffic income. Also to note that some of these blog statistics may be off plus-or-minus 3 values since the tally was done October 2nd and not October 1st.
MuseScore: A free music notation program that’s actually good
I’ve been looking for a music notation program forever that’s free, powerful, and isn’t a demo, and I finally found it.
I got the MuseScore application through a newsletter from Mac OS X freeware. It’s quite a big program though, but 100 megabytes later, I finally got to open the application for the first time. At first glance, it was much simpler than other similar programs I had tried previously. There were only a few toolbars for note input, playback, and editing, but that’s all I really needed. I knew this was an app that I would actually keep and use.
Entering notes in MuseScore is a piece of cake, and there are so many ways to do it. Just select a note value in note input mode and move the mouse to where you want the note to be. Or, you can type in notes with the keyboard (A-B-C-D-E-F-G) and move them with the Up or Down arrow. Inputting chords was also easy; just press Shift + (A, B, C, D, E, F, G) and it will build a chord. MuseScore will even fill in rests for me so that I didn’t have to! I especially appreciated the many ways that I could enter and edit notes, whether it be with mouse input, keyboard input, MIDI input, or a combination of the three.
Slurring and ties were also easy to accomplish in MuseScore. I just had to press “S” or “+”, respectively, and it would automatically form a slur. Then, to change the start and end positions, I just did Shift+Right or Shift+Left. Ties were done automatically just by pressing the “+” key.
MuseScore is also very intelligent. It follows the standard rules of music notation. It knows when to beam up, beam down, and how to break the beams of notes. 1st-and-2nd endings, dynamics, articulation, fingering, and grace notes are a walk in the park in MuseScore. However, there are still a few difficulties with voicing, where there are two or more voices in a single staff. MuseScore supports up to four voices per staff, but it can take a while to learn to input with voicing, and MuseScore still has a few bugs to address before voicing gets really simple.
One of the most useful features in the program is the playback. Unlike other programs, you can specify how you’d like the music to be played back, be it at a soft or loud, fast or slow, reverberant or not; it’s your choice. The playback tool is great for checking accurate note input, which brings me to one other point: when entering notes, MuseScore cannot tell the difference between E-flat and D-sharp, that is, no matter how you enter E-flat or D-sharp, MuseScore will recognize it as E-flat. However, there is a script pre-installed called Pitch Spell that tries to guess which one of the enharmonic notes it is.
Along with piano music, MuseScore also handles chamber music, violin music, symphony scores, and even kazoo music, although I haven’t tried them yet.
Other features in MuseScore include:
- Cross-beam notation (see figure at right):
- Automatic note head positioning in a staff
- Highlighting out-of-range tones (which apparently doesn’t work all the time)
- Plug-ins to create chord charts, color notes, insert note names, etc.
- Page and text style editing
- Export as PDF, PNG, SVG, MusicXML and many other formats
- …and pretty much anything you can write on real music notation paper, including triplets, line breaks, and so much more!
A few things don’t quite work yet:
- Voicing has a few bugs, including chord note positioning
- Arpeggiando positioning
- Slurring across multiple lines
- Beaming with triplets
- Mixed meter/key signature
I give MuseScore an 8.5/10 and highly recommend it to anyone who has been looking for a free yet powerful music notation program. Download at http://musescore.org.
August 2009 Blog Report
| Statistic | Value | Change from previous month |
| Number of views | 635 | +96.6%, +312 |
| Number of days |
31 | 0%, 0 |
| Average views/day | 20.49* | +96.6%, +10.42 |
| # of Tags (total) |
267 | — |
| # of Categories (total) |
17 | — |
| # of Comments (total) |
77 | — |
| # of Posts (total) |
53 | — |
| Busiest day |
August 27, 117 views* | N/A |
| Most viewed post |
Why I really hate Wikipedia…, 304 views (in August)* | N/A |
| Top referrer | fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, 85 views* | N/A |
| Top search term | “gargbhawna9@gmail.com”, 6 views | N/A |
| Top click | commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mount…, 16 clicks* | N/A |
Statistics are for this month only unless otherwise stated. Asterisk denotes all-time record, N/A = Not applicable, “—” = unavailable.
Total blog views since inception: 1149
Notes from the author: It’s scary how much my blog views jumped this month, all because of the popular post “Why I really hate Wikipedia administrators.” This post generated the most diverse audience my blog has ever seen and the most controversy I had ever had to deal with.
This blog report is also the first one I have done, and it took me over 20 minutes to compile all the data. If you have any suggestions for further blog reports, please leave a comment.
